ISO 27701 Introduction — Lesson 2: ISO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles

Learning Objectives

• Map the roles, prerequisites, decisions, and evidence shaping iSO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles for an organization extending its information security management system to cover privacy obligations and processing activities.
• Build PIMS integration and governance map through a controlled activity with reviewable checkpoints.
• Resolve the PIMS scope does not cover a key processing activity, validate the correction, and record the accepted result.

Detailed Topics

• ISO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001
• 27002
• Leadership
• Policy
• Roles
• Decision ownership, prerequisites, and acceptance evidence for iSO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles
• Security, compliance, resilience, documentation, and support implications for privacy management orientation

Instructor Demonstration

The instructor demonstrates iSO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles within an organization extending its information security management system to cover privacy obligations and processing activities, records each material decision in PIMS integration and governance map, and contrasts the accepted state with the controlled exception where the PIMS scope does not cover a key processing activity.

Hands-On Exercise

Complete a controlled exercise focused on iSO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles. Establish the expected outcome, produce PIMS integration and governance map, introduce the case where the PIMS scope does not cover a key processing activity, apply a reversible correction, and rerun the original acceptance checks.

1. Confirm the requirement, stakeholders, environment, assumptions, inputs, and expected result.
2. Perform the privacy management orientation workflow and capture evidence before and after each material decision.
3. Test normal, boundary, failure, security, compliance, recovery, and operational conditions where relevant.
4. Document the root cause, correction, rollback, owner, support action, and next improvement priority.

Scenario Analysis

• Identify the business or assurance decision required within an organization extending its information security management system to cover privacy obligations and processing activities.
• Compare control strength, evidence quality, operational impact, cost, resilience, and stakeholder trade-offs.
• Define escalation, communication, recovery, acceptance, and follow-up requirements for PIMS integration and governance map.

Troubleshooting Guidance

When the PIMS scope does not cover a key processing activity, separate the visible symptom from its governing requirement, verify source evidence and recent changes, test one reversible hypothesis, and update PIMS integration and governance map only after the corrected state passes normal and boundary checks.

Validation Checklist

• PIMS integration and governance map identifies the approved baseline, accountable owner, inputs, and expected result.
• Evidence confirms iSO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles under normal and relevant exception conditions.
• The response to “the PIMS scope does not cover a key processing activity” is reversible, tested, and supported by before-and-after records.
• Residual privacy management orientation risk, support ownership, deadlines, and the next action are recorded.

Lesson Outcome

Learners can apply ISO 27701 Relationship with ISO 27001 and 27002, Leadership, Policy, and Roles, explain the choices made, and defend the result using PIMS integration and governance map.