ISO 28000 Foundation — Lesson 2: Leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources

Learning Objectives

• Trace leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources from business need through implementation evidence in a manufacturing and logistics network formalizing security controls for cargo, facilities, information, partners, and disruptions.
• Create security planning and objective register that another practitioner can independently review.
• Diagnose risk criteria produce inconsistent priorities, test a reversible response, and confirm no residual failure remains.

Detailed Topics

• Leadership
• Policy
• Responsibilities
• Risk Criteria
• Objectives
• Planning
• Resources
• Decision ownership, prerequisites, and acceptance evidence for leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources
• Security, compliance, resilience, documentation, and support implications for supply-chain security foundation

Instructor Demonstration

Using a manufacturing and logistics network formalizing security controls for cargo, facilities, information, partners, and disruptions, the instructor performs leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources, preserves security planning and objective register, and tests the result against the realistic failure condition where risk criteria produce inconsistent priorities.

Hands-On Exercise

Execute a scenario-based task covering leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources. Record assumptions and controls in security planning and objective register, troubleshoot the case where risk criteria produce inconsistent priorities, and obtain a result another reviewer can reproduce.

1. Confirm the requirement, stakeholders, environment, assumptions, inputs, and expected result.
2. Perform the supply-chain security foundation workflow and capture evidence before and after each material decision.
3. Test normal, boundary, failure, security, compliance, recovery, and operational conditions where relevant.
4. Document the root cause, correction, rollback, owner, support action, and next improvement priority.

Scenario Analysis

• Identify the business or assurance decision required within a manufacturing and logistics network formalizing security controls for cargo, facilities, information, partners, and disruptions.
• Compare control strength, evidence quality, operational impact, cost, resilience, and stakeholder trade-offs.
• Define escalation, communication, recovery, acceptance, and follow-up requirements for security planning and objective register.

Troubleshooting Guidance

If risk criteria produce inconsistent priorities, pause unsupported conclusions. Recheck criteria, roles, records, interfaces, and exceptions; use security planning and objective register to prove the root cause and the effectiveness of the selected correction.

Validation Checklist

• security planning and objective register identifies the approved baseline, accountable owner, inputs, and expected result.
• Evidence confirms leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources under normal and relevant exception conditions.
• The response to “risk criteria produce inconsistent priorities” is reversible, tested, and supported by before-and-after records.
• Residual supply-chain security foundation risk, support ownership, deadlines, and the next action are recorded.

Lesson Outcome

Learners can apply Leadership, Policy, Responsibilities, Risk Criteria, Objectives, Planning, and Resources, explain the choices made, and defend the result using security planning and objective register.